|
|||
Anthony Prieto
April 1, 2010 6:57 AM
In response to Julia Di Sieno’s recent guest commentary, “Too hard to bear,” and after reading some of the follow-up responses, I felt I had to speak up as well.
I’ve hunted in Santa Barbara’s back country for almost 25 years. I hunt wild pigs and black-tail deer only. I only shoot what I’m going to feed my family.
I’ve seen a depletion of wildlife and loss of habitat as well in this relatively short time. In reading Ms. Di Sieno’s take, I fully endorse and agree with her strong feelings re: the Department of Fish and Game’s proposed stance on increasing the allowed tags (800 more) for black bears during the designated bear season. On top of that, adding hounds with GPS units.
Over the past 250 years, in what is now called California, we have lost the grizzly bear, gray wolf, American jaguar and probably now, the wolverine. Going to Montana annually, I’ve seen the hate and resentment toward grizzlies, wolves and mountain lions there. All to save a cow or sheep, for which the government will compensate if, in fact, there is a loss of livestock.
It amazes me to see the ignorance and audacity of people, especially when these predators have been there thousands of years before any of those people were ever even in that region. Why is it, in our society, we seem to feel we have to wipe out and kill the top predators of these regions?
Black bears, though plentiful in both areas, are hunted. Black bears are also a major piece in this ecosystem. To increase the quota of bear tags up another 800, and to allow the use of hounds with GPS is crazy. Especially regarding sows (female bears) with cubs.
I understand that we as hunters think we are conservationists and, to keep certain populations down, there are designated seasons for certain species. To say that there’s now an over-abundance of black bears in California is like saying there is no global warming. If anything, there are too many people encroaching on their habitat.
If that’s the case, let it be archery-only to level the playing field. No rifles, no handguns, no hounds with GPS units. We as hunters already have such a huge advantage with the high-powered rifles we use.
The indigenous people of what is now California revered both black and grizzly bears alike. The bear was a sacred animal, a spiritual brother of the wild. What a sad, sorry sight this society has become when we continually try to justify killing more predators as people continually encroach and build homes and ranches deeper and deeper into their habitat.
Anthony Prieto lives in Santa Barbara.
A year ago two tiny mountain lion kittens exposed a huge hole in California’s mountain lion protection policies. Even the state known for setting the standard in lion protection still has work to do before mountain lions will truly be “specially protected.” The ban on hunting lions for fun was only a first step; clarifying policies and facilitating communication between the state Department of Fish & Game, wildlife rescue groups, and the public, remain on the “to-do” list. These two kittens learned about the short-comings firsthand. The California Department of Fish & Game (CDFG) is the state agency responsible for managing wildlife and protecting mountain lions Unfortunately, that protection was put to the test on April 3, 2009, when two malnourished orphaned cougar cubs wandered into the community of Solvang. The kittens then faced a rocky future which included a bumpy ride in the back of a CDFG pickup truck, spending the night crammed together in a dog crate at a pet hospital, transportation to yet another facility, exams from a second round of vets, ultimately being split up well over a year before they would have in the wild, and sent to zoos on opposite sides of the country. The kitten sent to the east coast was subjected to additional trauma by an airport worker who paraded the cat around for his buddies. The second kitten eventually found a home at the Folsom Zoo located just outside of Sacramento, California. Although both cats are wary of people, and rightly so, zoo staff remain hopeful they will eventually settle down and begin to trust their caretakers. As for Julia and the Animal Rescue Team, an outpour of public support and a meeting with the Santa Barbara County District Attorney resulted in charges not being filed against her, but CDFG will be monitoring her facility closely. This was an appalling outcome for a situation where a rescue team was only trying to help their community and the native wildlife. Every state entrusts the welfare of their wild animals to the state game agency. In California, residents have told CDFG twice through ballot measures that mountain lions are special and should be treated with extra care. Yet, twenty years later, policies still have not been written, nor does CDFG seem willing to work with the numerous qualified groups, such as the Mountain Lion Foundation, that are eager to help. In this case, CDFG proved they are still more concerned with their ego and maintaining power than doing what is right for the state’s mountain lions. How many more ballot measures and mistreated kittens will it take before they get the message? “For once, I have a decent home,” Julia Di Sieno, executive director of Santa Ynez Valley-based Animal Rescue Team Inc., excitedly told the News-Press last week.The tireless animal rescue worker closed escrow on her new home, which is also the new home of the nonprofit Animal Rescue Team, in October 2009. She and the myriad of animals in her care moved into their new 1.1-acre digs on Carriage Drive in Solvang the same month that escrow closed. Ms. Di Sieno lives on the property in order to provide round-the-clock care to the animal boarders she helps rescue, rehabilitate and release back into their natural habitat after they are nursed back to health. Last year, the Animal Rescue Team released more than 100 rehabilitated large mammals back into their natural environment.The Animal Rescue Team had leased a property on Covered Wagon Road, just around the corner from their new home, until the owner of the property defaulted on his payments, forcing Ms. Di Sieno and the animals to look for a new home. With the help of some private investors and by liquidating most of her stocks, she was able to put a down payment on the new $675,000 property. Although Ms. Di Sieno contemplated purchasing the previous property, which sat on 1.4 acres, the owner was asking $1.1 million – well above her price threshold and about $300,000 more than it was actually worth, she said.Although she was devastated when she learned she had to move, the predicament ended up being a blessing in disguise by providing a permanent address to the rescue operation. “I’ve moved 10 times in 10 years” because of outgrowing previous facilities and other challenges, she said. The previous property was larger, but the new one has more usable space, Ms. Di Sieno said, adding that it will allow her to take in more hurt and needy animals. Ms. Di Sieno currently has three dozen rescued wild animals in her care, including a vole, a baby weasel, bunnies, hummingbirds, foxes, bobcats, ducks and squirrels. She is also carrying for a puppy and some cats. The new property came complete with corrals, two barn stalls, two self-contained water troughs, a food storage room, fencing, a main house for Ms. Di Sieno to live in and a guest house that serves as an animal nursery hospital. The Covered Wagon Road property had no fencing or corrals, and the Animal Rescue Team, which consists of Ms. Di Sieno and about 20 volunteers, had to invest about $10,000 in improvements to the property. The main house on the old property was smaller, and she rented out the guest house for extra income. “This (new property) was already groomed to perfection,” she said. Still, Ms. Di Sieno had to make a lot of improvements to the property – and more still needs to be done. Volunteer contractors, she said, are needed to set up a pen for rescued fawns, and a utility sink needs to be installed. Since she moved in, Ms. Di Sieno and volunteers have set up eight mammal enclosures, built platforms, fenced off a horse corral, added lighting and installed roofing. In addition to needing more volunteers and a sponsor for the group’s animal ambulance, the animal activist said she is in serious need of donations and grants to help her continue running her operation. The struggling operation has been receiving fewer donations since the recession, she said. The animal rescue worker said that her operating costs, which include food and medication for the animals and her mortgage, run about $5,000 to $6,000 a month. She continuously struggles to get by – even with the help of some grants and donations – and must work a second job to try to make ends meet. She has also lost income she had received from renting out the guest house on the previous property. “It’s hard when you’re worried about your next check and you’re trying to save an animal’s life,” she said. “Our biggest expense is around the corner – baby season.” Some short-term relief came in the form of a $25,000 grant to the organization last month by a News-Press reader who had read about the rescue team in previous stories and was touched by Ms. Di Sieno’s dedication and mission. “Peter F. Hilf, through his family foundation, the MacDonald Family Foundation, arranged for a grant of $25,000 to the Animal Rescue Team Inc.,” she said. Those much-needed funds, she said, will help her pay for some of her operating costs. Worries about financial challenges have not swayed Ms. Di Sieno from her mission. Santa Barbara County sheriffs, she said, continuously make referrals to the group to place abused, abandoned and ill animals, and the organization is an official county probation site. Offenders younger than 18 can volunteer with the Animal Rescue Team as part of their community service. A few of the minors, she said, have asked to go on rescue calls with her to pick up animals, and one offender expressed interest in continuing to volunteer there even after her service was completed. The group received certification in disaster animal response training in January 2010 through the Humane Society so they can rescue animals that are displaced or injured as a result of disasters in Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo and Ventura counties. In addition, Ms. Di Sieno said, the group is the only Fish and Game-permitted wildlife facility that takes in orphaned fawns from Los Angeles to San Francisco. The group is one of only 104 such permitted facilities throughout the state. “Our work is very unique,” she said. As to why she has devoted 25 years of her life to rescuing and rehabilitating animals, Ms. Di Sieno explained, “These animals deserve a chance at life, just like we do.” To find out more about volunteer opportunities with the Animal Rescue Team or to make donations, call the team’s hotline at 896-1859 or go to www.animalrescueteam.net. e-mail: mwormser@newspress.com Mount Shasta, Calif. – The Sierra Club has filed a letter opposing a California Department of Fish and Game proposal to expand the use of dogs by bear hunters. If approved, the DFG proposal will increase the hounding of bears by dog packs, as well as expand black bear hunting into San Luis Obispo County and other areas of the state. |
|||
Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |